Opening Move: Spring 1901
On January 9, 2009, I posted about my enrolling in an online board game of Diplomacy with some old Internet friends from the early 1990s. Diplomacy is a war game played by seven people. However, it involves more negotiation and agreement with the other six, than skilled tactical moves. The tactics in the game are pretty simple.
This post looks at the moves made to open up the game. Generally, in the first year, there is not typically a lot of direct conflict. However, the moves people make, and the units they build, can show a player's probable objectives, and reveal his or her most likely alliances with other players. One must find alliances in Diplomacy, or the "Great Power" being played is quickly destroyed. Here my Great Power is Italy. Below is a map of all the moves, and my analysis of what they could mean.

All of Italy's moves planned for the spring were executed without misorder, stalemate, or disruption.
There are some unusual and interesting elements to the moves made by the other players.
Austria-Russia: In most games, the border province of Galacia (north of Austria, south of Warsaw) is so key neither Russia or Austria would risk allowing another unit into it. Thus, most players arrange to at least bounce units and keep the area neutral (each Great Power orders one unit to Galacia resulting in a "stand-off"). However, in this case, Russia moved to A War-Ukr and Austria moved to A Vie-Budapest. Neither Great Power sought to grab this key area, and neither saw the need to insist on protection. Those moves are very friendly and suggest a lot of trust between Russian and Austria. This could be indicative of an alliance.
Turkey-Russia: The Black Sea is also a critical space. It is like Galacia in that normally you see Turkey and Russia bouncing each other out because of the risk associated with allowing the other into it unscathed. Here, Turkey successfully moved to the Black Sea. That is indicative of (1) a very, very close trusting relationship between Russia and Turkey, or (2), Turkey violated an agreement with Russia to keep the territory neutral.
Russia-England: Russia's move of A Mos-Stp is probably regarded as somewhat hostile to English interests. Most openings involve Mos-Ukr. In 1901, England expects to take Norway. Russia would hope to get Sweden.
Here, Russia's move to Stp, which adjoins Norway, threatens to cause England a significant amount of difficulty. England will now have to use both of his fleets to take Norway, which likely eliminates any moves England may have otherwise planned, such as taking Belgium.
England, like Italy, will be nervous about the prospect of France and/or Germany gaining three builds at the end of 1901. It is very possible that all three, Germany, France and Russia, have made an agreement to attack England. England is going to be paranoid about that situation when he looks at these moves.
England - France: You normally expect to see France move to the English channel if there is to be an immediate hostile action by E/F against England. In this case, all of the moves are pretty neutral. Neither England nor France moved to the channel. Therefore, it appears that England and France remain on good terms . . . at least superficially.
Germany-France: Germany did not move aggressively toward France. One opening that is possible, is an attack on Burgundy. In this case, that was not ordered. Likewise, France did not move into that space, which is adjacent to Munich. It appears that the Great Powers in the west (England, France, and Germany) are tip-toeing around trying not to be too aggressive with one another at this point.
Read More......